After eighty years of socialist
revolution, the almighty USSR crumbled and disappeared. Mean while, China´s
socialist revolution was growing fast and nowadays is one of the World’s
economic leaders. Cuba is a wonderful example of revolutionary moral and
endurance but has been unable to achieve economic growth and development; yes,
the US blockade has a lot to do with it, we are aware of that, but is it the
only cause? And how about Venezuela, a rich country that at the beginning of
the revolution had a big problem of unfair wealth distribution that now lies in
a failed economy and a country in ruins.
If you ask a rightist politician or
the Chairman of a Bank or the biggest shareholder of a big oil company which
was the key common problem in all this countries, the immediate answer would
be: Socialism is to blame. And if you
make the same question to a regular person that makes a living with the salary
or emoluments received as a bank clerk, a public servant, construction worker,
taxi driver, lawyer, bar tender and whatever else, most probably we will get
the same answer.
How about us? We, all the people that
say Socialism is the only way to solve the problems of mankind. Are we going to
keep saying that US Imperialism is the main reason?
With the exception of today China you
will find that none of the economies of Cuba and Venezuela are sustainable,
like the economy of the USSR was not either, the simple reason is because they
do not receive enough income to break even with the expenses. Since the State
absorbs the ownership of all (or almost all) production means, enlarges
bureaucracy and expands social costs (some say social investment) it also has
to meet many payments compromises but production steadily slows down in the
hands of bureaucrats and diminishing income and tax payments. This is the main
problem Socialism has. It starts very well by distributing wealth (services at
no cost, very low food prices, all four stages of education for free, health
national system, etc) until the income fails to come in and delays and
deterioration shows up and all begins to stop and it’s the end of the socialist
experiment.
If this is the difficulty then we
must find a way to solve it. The Chinese Communist Party found a solution. In
China an ample territorial area was declared of free market, foreign investment
was invited to come in and soon factories and stores blossomed with external
and also local capitals, thousands of jobs were created, a lot of taxes were
paid, the economy grew and the Chinese State received enough money to sustain the
socialist part of China.
Although is a solution, it does not
answer the main question of how to make socialism progress economically to
sustain the system.
In view of this, we may look at a mix
economy as an instrument of progress. In Venezuela we should have a mix economy
according to article 299 of the Bolivarian Constitution that says: “…The State,
jointly with private initiative, shall promote the harmonious development of
the national economy for the purpose of generating sources of employment and a
high rate of national added value, raising the standard of living of the
population and strengthening the economy sovereignty of the country,
guaranteeing legal certainty and solid, dynamic, sustainable, permanent and
equitable growth of the economy to achieve a fair distribution of wealth
through participatory democracy and strategic planning with open consultation.”
The thing is that the leadership of
the Revolution instead of following the constitutional principle opted for the
expropriation of most of the means of production of the country. The results
are in front of us. Factories shut down or with insufficient production because
of ill management and lack of material to process. This is something that
started to happen from 2010 but then we still had a healthy oil industry whose
financial resources were milked away to import whatever goods were declared
necessary by the leadership of government (including food and medicines), the
trouble is that the Oil Corporation of the Venezuela State (PDVSA) was unable
to make the needed investment to keep the production of +- 3 million barrels of
crude oil per day and now can only serve around 700 thousand B/D.
To underline the importance of this
matter we can compare the economic situation of Venezuela versus Bolivia.
President Evo Morales and his Vicepresident, García Liniera practiced a mixed
economy. They nationalized the oil and gas industry and with it received
financial resources that were enlarged by the taxes that then were redirected
to social expending. The Bolivian economy was not hurt because of it, on the
contrary, Bolivia for the past ten years has had the fasts growing economy of
South America, with less unemployment and inflation.
The troubles of Evo Morales that
conducted to his overthrowing were of a different nature. He wanted to be
candidate for the presidency for the fourth time and the Constitution did not
allow it. Then he decided to submit the matter to a consultation with the
Bolivian People (Referendum) but the results were against it. Albeit, Evo did
not rest, he went to the Supreme Court and got their support with a ruling that
said he could be candidate because it was part of his human rights. Of course
there is more to it but the political complexity deserves an entire paper
dedicated to the subject.
By the way, this is something that
has to be reviewed. There is a trend for the personal permanence in power of
the leader. Even there are rights of heritage because the exercise of power
goes to sons and grandsons like in kingdoms. North Korea is an example.
Now, so far we find that is
capitalism that serves ways to help accomplish the ends of socialism, to be
precise, the social distribution of wealth, like in China. But it should be
interesting to work on a project that takes elements of capitalism and has them
work to all socialist purposes. This will be the topic of the next article we
will deliver.
Ccs. Oct.17, 2019 Published in Hispanic LA
https://hispanicla.com/is-socialism-in-peril-by-fernando-vegas-41646

No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario